 |
|
Animal welfare in the dairy
industry |
Setting the scene
In 2006/07, Australians consumed an average of 104 litres of
milk and 12 kilograms of cheese each(1).
Every year, around 1.8 million cows produce over 5000 litres of
milk to supply domestic and international demand for dairy
products(2). Dairy production in
Australia is largely pasture-based which means that dairy cows
graze in paddocks and are supplementary fed with grains, hay and
silage when necessary. Most dairy farms are found in the higher
rainfall areas along the coast although a significant number of
farms in Victoria and New South Wales rely on irrigation for
pasture growth. By far the greatest number of dairy cattle are
located in Victoria, followed by New South Wales and Queensland(3).
Some dairy farms are not pasture-based and rely entirely on hand
feeding cows in large sheds in a system where cows have no access
to pasture. In 2006/07, the production of wholemilk was
Australia’s second largest rural industry valued at $3.2 billion,
just above wheat for grain production at $2.5 billion but well
behind cattle and calves slaughterings valued at $8.0 billion(4)
Animal welfare issues in the dairy industry
The dairy industry has identified five key welfare issues:
bobby calves, calving induction, tail docking, lameness and
dehorning/disbudding(5). RSPCA
Australia believes that these and other issues are a key concern
and need to be urgently addressed:
Bobby calves – a by-product of dairy farming
Bobby calves – housing and rearing
Bobby calves – handling, transport, assembly and
slaughter
Calving induction
Disbudding and dehorning of dairy calves/cows
Tail docking of dairy cows
Lameness
Mastitis
Live export of dairy heifers
Bobby calves – a by-product of dairy farming
Cows have to give birth to a calf every year in order to
produce milk. In the dairy industry, most calves are separated
from their mother within 12 hours of birth to reduce the risk of
infection and/or spread of disease. Research suggests that
separating cow and calf within 24 hours of birth is the least
stressful for both cow and calf(6).
All bull calves (males) and a percentage of heifer calves
(females) are considered to be a by-product of dairy farming.
Those classed as ‘bobby calves’ are separated from their mother at
less than a day old and sold, often for slaughter, at less than
five days old. 918,900 calves were slaughtered in Australia in
2006/07 with around 575,000 of these being killed in Victoria
alone(7).
Bobby calves – housing and rearing
Once separated from their mother, bobby calves are transferred
to a shed where they are supplemented with colostrum and then fed
milk or milk-replacer, usually once a day.
About one quarter of heifer calves are retained annually as
replacements for older cows that are culled from the herd.
Replacement heifers may be reared on the property or by a
professional calf rearer on a different property until they are
old enough to join the herd.
A small percentage of bull calves are also retained and are
reared for up to nine months for veal production. Some dairy
farmers mate their cows to beef breeds so that calves produce
better veal.
Because bobby calves are destined for slaughter at a very early
age, they are generally not treated with the same consideration as
the more valuable replacement heifers or bull calves for rearing.
Housing facilities, bedding, cleanliness and general care can vary
considerably depending on the calf’s purpose.
Bobby calves – handling, transport, assembly
and slaughter
Young calves destined for slaughter are required to be in their
fifth day of life before being transported to the abattoir. Dairy
farmers sign a National Vendor Declaration declaring calf age and
whether the calf is fit and sound enough to travel. A truck will
collect calves from the dairy farm twice a week during calving
season and deliver them to a central collection point (calf scale)
or directly to the abattoir. Calves delivered to a calf scale are
collected and then transported to the abattoir. The Model Code
of Practice for the Welfare of Animals: Cattle states that
bobby calves should not be transported for more than 10 hours and
should be slaughtered on the day of arrival at the abattoir(8).
However, anecdotal evidence suggests that this does not always
occur.
Once slaughtered, the calf is processed for human consumption
(e.g. veal, baby food and processed meat) with the hide used in
the high-value leather market. Other by-products derived from
calves are used in the pharmaceutical market (e.g. the calf’s
stomach may be used in the production of tablets).
Animal welfare issues relating to the handling, transport,
assembly and slaughter of bobby calves include:
- Young calves are physiologically incapable of withstanding the
stress, strain and rigours of transport.
- Young calves do not yet have the following behaviour required
for easy loading and unloading – this may result in rough
handling.
- It is difficult to accurately determine the calf’s age, making
it difficult to ensure compliance with the minimum age requirement
for transport.
- Trucks provide calves with little protection from the
elements, no bedding and little room to lie down.
- Holding yards at calf scales and abattoirs are concrete or
dirt-floored with no bedding and no protection from the elements.
- Young calves are deprived of milk for extended periods.
| RSPCA Australia believes that calves must not be transported
until they are 10 days old. They must be fed at least 4 hours
prior to transport and not transported for longer than 10 hours in
trucks that provide protection from the elements, bedding and room
for all calves to lie down.
RSPCA Australia believes that calves must be handled in a
manner that will avoid injury, suffering or distress. Calves are
not to be kicked, beaten, thrown or ‘dumped’, or prodded with any
sharp instrument. The use of electrical goading devices or dogs on
calves is not acceptable.
Visit
http://www.rspca.org.au/campaign/transport.asp for more
information. |
Calving induction
If a pregnant cow’s due date falls outside the desired time for
calving, the dairy farmer may decide to induce the calf, causing
it to be born prematurely. Cows will then return to
close-to-normal production and fertility in the next mating season
and their calves will be born within the required calving span(9)
Induction mimics natural calving and is done by injecting the cow
with a corticosteroid hormone which stimulates final udder
development and prepares the reproductive tract for birth(10).
Induced cows will calve between eight to fourteen days later.
There are, however, problems with the technique of calving
induction.
Animal welfare issues relating to calving induction include(11)
- Calf death – calves born dead or having to be killed because
they are not viable.
- Method of euthanasia – blunt trauma to the head is used to
kill unviable calves.
- Maternal death – death of the cow as a result of infection due
to retained foetal membrane.
- Retained foetal membrane – the foetal membrane is not expelled
after birth.
- Calving difficulty – smaller calves may not be positioned
correctly at calving.
- Photosensitisation – increased sensitivity to ultraviolet
light causing sunburn on the cow’s teats.
| RSPCA Australia is opposed to the use of induced calving as a
husbandry practice to regularise milk production in a dairy herd
as it causes observable adverse welfare problems for both cow and
calf.
RSPCA Australia believes that emergency euthanasia should
preferably be carried out using a rifle. Calves may also be killed
with a captive bolt gun followed by bleeding out. A blow to the
head with a blunt object must only be used as a last resort and
only on calves that have been induced or are within 24 hours old.
Euthanasia must be carried out by a person competent in the
methods described. This person should also confirm that the calf
is dead. |
Disbudding and dehorning of dairy
calves/cows
Disbudding is the removal of the horn bud before it attaches to
the animal’s skull, whereas dehorning is removal of the horn once
it has attached to the skull. The practice is performed on many
dairy farms to reduce the incidence of bruising and potential
injury to other animals or people. Dairy Australia recommends
disbudding using heat cauterisation as soon as the horn bud
appears(12) .
Animal welfare issues associated with disbudding or
dehorning:
- Disbudding and dehorning results in acute pain.
- Both disbudding and dehorning are performed without the use of
anaesthetic or pain relief and often without effective restraint
of the calf.
| RSPCA Australia strongly supports the breeding of poll animals
to preclude the need for the procedure in the longer term.
RSPCA Australia believes that where disbudding and dehorning is
performed, animals must be provided with appropriate anaesthetic
and pain-relieving product. |
Tail docking of dairy cows
Routine tail docking of up to two-thirds of the cow’s tail at
12-18 months old, was introduced mainly for the benefit of the
milker but also in the belief that tail docking reduces the risk
of mastitis, improves milk quality, leaves udders cleaner and
reduces fly numbers(13). However,
there is no evidence that supports these beliefs(14).
Dairy Australia surveyed dairy farmers in 2005 and found that tail
docking is on the decline with farmers trimming the switch rather
than docking the tail(15); with
around 16% of farmers still routinely tail docking their cows(16).
Animal welfare issues associated with tail docking of dairy
cows(17):
- Tails are docked using a rubber ring, a sharp knife or a hot
docking iron. The procedure is performed without the use of
anaesthetic or pain relief. The cow experiences acute pain.
- The cow may experience chronic pain due to inflammation and
lesions caused by the procedure. Neuromas (nerve tumours) are also
a cause of chronic pain.
- Shortening the tail prevents the cow from swatting at flies,
resulting in an increased number of flies around the hind quarters
as well as the cow using other fly-avoidance behaviours.
| RSPCA Australia is opposed to the docking of the tails of any
species of animal unless under veterinary advice on the grounds of
an individual animal’s health. |
Lameness
Foot lameness is a common problem in dairy farming and not
unusual in wet conditions. It can be caused by cows having to walk
long distances from paddock to dairy parlour – particularly if
these tracks are not well-maintained – and by standing on concrete
floors for long periods. This results in the soles of the feet
becoming overworn and bruised, or stones becoming embedded in
between the toes. However, it is also related to nutrition and
abnormalities in conformation and to impatient stockhandling.
Animal welfare issues associated with lameness in dairy cows(18):
- Lameness is painful.
- Lameness causes an animal to eat less and lie down more,
resulting in loss of body condition.
| RSPCA Australia believes that farm animal husbandry and
management practices should provide for the behavioural, social
and physiological needs of the individual animal and not cause
unnecessary injury, suffering or distress. |
Mastitis
Mastitis is an infection of the cow’s udder caused by bacteria
or by injury, and can affect up to 40% of the herd(19).
Occurrence is related to hygiene and other procedures at milking
as well as nutrition. Mastitis is not always easy to detect,
particularly because most cases are sub-clinical and the redness
and swelling of the udder is not obvious.
Animal welfare issues associated with mastitis:
- The swelling and inflammation of the udder causes severe pain.
- Cows exhibit clear signs of discomfort, including abnormal
posture, increased sensitivity, rapid breathing and heart rate,
and elevated temperature.
- May cause the death of the cow.
| RSPCA Australia believes that farm animal husbandry and
management practices should provide for the behavioural, social
and physiological needs of the individual animal and not cause
unnecessary injury, suffering or distress. |
Live export of dairy heifers
In 2005, nearly 50,000 dairy heifers were exported for breeding
purposes mainly to China and Mexico, but also to customers in
Turkey, Pakistan, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Jordan(20).
Close to 90% of these heifers originate from Victoria and are
exported through the port of Portland. Heifers may be either
pregnant or not and are usually between 12 and 15 months old.
Animal welfare issues associated with the live export of
heifers
- Standards for the export of livestock(21)
do not distinguish between slaughter cattle and dairy cattle for
breeding in terms of stocking density and transport conditions.
- Export standards allow pregnant animals to travel in their
third trimester of pregnancy.
- Transport is stressful to animals – a lowered immune system
contributes to respiratory disease.
- Animals are subjected to extremes of humidity and temperature
and may suffer from heat stress.
- Heifers may be transported to countries where poor animal
handling, transport and slaughter are routine practice.
- At their destination, heifers are susceptible to diseases that
are not endemic in Australia and for which they have not been
vaccinated – resulting in disease and/or mortality.
| RSPCA Australia believes animals must not be assembled,
loaded, transported or unloaded in a way which is likely to cause
injury, suffering or distress.
RSPCA Australia is opposed the export of live food animals for
slaughter or further fattening. |
Dairy industry facts and figures
Dairy cows – milk production
67% of dairy cows in Australia are Holstein Friesian with the
remainder being Jersey or Holstein/Jersey cross(22).
Holstein Friesian is often the preferred breed because they have a
higher milk yield and a lower protein and butterfat percentage
than the other dairy breeds. A combination of genetics, nutrition
and management has seen a dramatic increase in the amount of milk
a cow produces each year – for example, in 1966/67 the average
milk yield per cow was 2,383 litres, 40 years later in 2006/07 the
average milk yield was 5,324 litres(23).
Most dairy cows are milked twice a day (and sometimes three times)
and, after each morning’s milking, are generally rotated among one
of several available paddocks. The average lifespan of a dairy cow
is six to seven years.
Dairy cows - reproduction and calving(24)
Calves in southern Australia are traditionally born in spring
and autumn to match the cow’s high feed requirements to the
availability of pasture. To achieve this, dairy farmers try to
ensure that their cows are all on heat and mated (or artificially
inseminated) at about the same time. A cow is on heat for a period
of 18-36 hours every 21 days. Dairy heifers are first mated at 2
years old and the gestation length is around 280 days. A cow will
generally have a 60-day ‘dry’ period prior to calving in which it
is not producing milk. Following the calf’s birth, the placenta is
expelled, the cow’s uterus contracts and the uterus lining returns
to normal pre-calving condition. The time between calving and
first heat is anywhere between 21 and 42 days. In order to help
synchronise calving, dairy farmers may use hormones to manipulate
the normal oestrus cycle of the cow. This also allows dairy
farmers to plan calving for autumn rather than spring, or to calve
in both spring and autumn, or to calve all year round – in other
words, a calving pattern to suit market demand.
How you can help
Make your voice heard! Write to the
Australian Government Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and
Forestry, your
State or Territory Primary Industry / Agriculture Minister or
your
local MP.
Contact the makers of your favourite dairy products (be they
milk, yogurt or cheese). Contact details are often on the label.
Tell the dairy industry that young animals should not be treated
this way.
Spread the word. Write a letter to the editor of your local
paper, raising awareness about the plight of bobby calves.
1. Dairy Australia, 2007, Australian
Dairy Industry in Focus 2007.
2. Dairy Australia, 2007, Australian Dairy Industry in Focus 2007.
3. ABARE, 2007, Commodity Statistics 2007.
4. ABS, 2007, Value of principal agricultural commodities produced
(preliminary estimates), 2006-07, Cat.no. 7501.0.
5. Dairy Australia, 2006, Dairy welfare we care, Dairy Australia,
Victoria.
6. See, for example, Stehulova, I., Lidfors, L., & Spinka, M.,
2008, Response of dairy cows and calves to early separation:
Effect of calf age and visual and auditory contact after
separation, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 110: 144-165.
7. ABS, 2007, Livestock products, 2006-07, Cat.no. 7215.0
8. Commonwealth of Australia 2004, Model Code of Practice for the
Welfare of Animals: Cattle, 2nd edition, Primary Industries
Standing Committee, PISC Report 85.
9. Brightling, P., Hides, S., Jubb, T., Larcombe, M. & Malmo, J.,
1992, Chapter 4: Mating management. In: Dairy farming in the
Macalister Irrigation District, Macalister Research Farm
Cooperative
10. Mansell, P., 2007, Welfare issues of calving induction,
Presentation at RSPCA Victoria Dairy Welfare Seminar, 29 August
2007, Burwood, Victoria.
11. Hides, S., 2007, Calving induction in dairy cows, Agriculture
Notes AG0384, Department of Primary Industries, Victoria.
12. Dairy Australia, 2006, Dairy welfare we care, Dairy Australia,
Victoria.
13. Jongman, E., 2007, The welfare consequences of tail docking,
lameness and mastitis in dairy cows, Presentation at RSPCA
Victoria Dairy Welfare Seminar, 29 August 2007, Burwood, Victoria.
14. See for example: Stull, C.L., Payne, M.A., Berry, S.L. and
Hullinger, P.J., 2002, Evaluation of the scientific justification
for tail docking in dairy cattle, Journal of the American
Veterinary Association 220: 1298-1303.
15. Dairy Australia, 2006, Dairy welfare we care, Dairy Australia,
Victoria.
16. Burgess, A., 2007, Dairy industry perspective on animal
welfare, Presentation at RSPCA Victoria Dairy Welfare Seminar, 29
August 2007, Burwood, Victoria.
17. Jongman, E., 2007, The welfare consequences of tail docking,
lameness and mastitis in dairy cows, Presentation at RSPCA
Victoria Dairy Welfare Seminar, 29 August 2007, Burwood, Victoria.
18. Hemsworth, P. et al., 1995, The welfare of extensively managed
dairy cattle: A review, Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 42(3):
161-182 .
19. Jongman, E., 2007, The welfare consequences of tail docking,
lameness and mastitis in dairy cows, Presentation at RSPCA
Victoria Dairy Welfare Seminar, 29 August 2007, Burwood, Victoria.
20. MLA, 2007, The live export industry: Assessing the value of
the livestock export industry to regional Australia, Meat &
Livestock Australia, North Sydney.
21. Commonwealth of Australia, 2006, Australian Standards for the
Export of Livestock, Version 2.1, Department of Agriculture,
Fisheries & Forestry, Canberra.
22. Dairy Australia, 2007, Australian Dairy Industry in Focus
2007.
23. ABARE, 2007 Commodity Statistics 2007.
24. Brightling, P., Hides, S., Jubb, T., Larcombe, M. & Malmo, J.,
1992, Chapter 4: Mating management. In: Dairy farming in the
Macalister Irrigation District, Macalister Research Farm
Cooperative |